4.6 Article

School Use and Normative Perceptions of Electronic Nicotine Product Use Among Middle and High School Students-November 2018

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH
卷 68, 期 3, 页码 612-614

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.06.035

关键词

E-cigarettes; Electronic nicotine products; Nicotine; Adolescent; School health

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health
  2. Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services [HHSN271201600001C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that nearly one in five U.S. middle and high school students believed that at least half of their peers used ENPs, and nearly six in 10 reported ever seeing someone use ENPs in or around their school. Therefore, targeted prevention strategies and education efforts are essential to prevent and combat adolescent ENP use in and around schools.
Purpose: This study examined U.S. middle and high school student observations of electronic nicotine product (ENP) use in and around the school building and students' normative perceptions of use among peers. Methods: Adolescents and young adult participants enrolled in middle (n = 672) or high school (n = 962) were recruited from an online nationally representative panel and surveyed from November 2 to 15, 2018. They answered questions on observed ENP use in and around the school building as well as perceptions of use among peers. Results: Nearly one in five U.S. middle and high school students believed that at least half of their peers used ENPs. Confirming anecdotal reports, nearly six in 10 reported ever seeing someone use ENPs in or around their school, most often outside the school building and in bathrooms or locker rooms. Conclusions: The findings of this study underscore the importance of targeted prevention strategies and education efforts to prevent and combat adolescent ENP use in and around schools. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据