4.0 Article

First snow, glacier and groundwater contribution quantification in the upper Mendoza River basin using stable water isotopes

期刊

ISOTOPES IN ENVIRONMENTAL AND HEALTH STUDIES
卷 56, 期 5-6, 页码 566-585

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10256016.2020.1797713

关键词

Chile; climate change; groundwater; hydrogen-2; isotope hydrology; Mendoza River; oxygen-18; rock glacier; groundwater; snow; water sources

资金

  1. Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Cientifico y Tecnologico [3180682]
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT 2011-2703]
  3. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo [PID]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Mendoza River streamflow, South America (similar to 32 degrees S), derives almost exclusively from winter snow precipitation falling in the Andes. Almost 70% of the water feeding the river originates in the Cordillera Principal geological province. In addition to the snow that precipitates in this area, there are 951 cryoforms providing meltwater to the upper catchment. Given the high inter-annual variability of snowfall and the megadrought affecting the region since 2010, it is crucial to quantify the contribution from different water sources buffering the Mendoza River runoff. Combining instrumental records of streamflow from glaciers and rivers, meteorological data, remote sensing of snow-covered areas and ionic and stable isotope analysis of different water sources, this study attempts to understand the hydrological contribution of different water sources to the basin. We demonstrated for the first time the relevance of different water sources in addition to snow in a dry period. During the melting season, 65% of the streamwaters originated from the glaciers (i.e. 50 and 15% from glaciers and rock glaciers, respectively), representing a higher proportion compared to snowmelt (17%). Groundwater input showed relatively large contributions, averaging 18%. This work offers information to develop adaptation strategies for future climate change scenarios in the region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据