4.8 Article

Division of functional roles for termite gut protists revealed by single-cell transcriptomes

期刊

ISME JOURNAL
卷 14, 期 10, 页码 2449-2460

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41396-020-0698-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japanese Society for Promotion of Science [16H07451, 18K14783, 17H01447]
  2. RIKEN Competitive Program for Creative Science and Technology
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H07451, 18K14783, 17H01447] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microbiome in the hindgut of wood-feeding termites comprises various species of bacteria, archaea, and protists. This gut community is indispensable for the termite, which thrives solely on recalcitrant and nitrogen-poor wood. However, the difficulty in culturing these microorganisms has hindered our understanding of the function of each species in the gut. Although protists predominate in the termite gut microbiome and play a major role in wood digestion, very few culture-independent studies have explored the contribution of each species to digestion. Here, we report single-cell transcriptomes of four protists species comprising the protist population in worldwide pestCoptotermes formosanus. Comparative transcriptomic analysis revealed that the expression patterns of the genes involved in wood digestion were different among species, reinforcing their division of roles in wood degradation. Transcriptomes, together with enzyme assays, also suggested that one of the protists,Cononympha leidyi, actively degrades chitin and assimilates it into amino acids. We propose thatC. leidyicontributes to nitrogen recycling and inhibiting infection from entomopathogenic fungi through chitin degradation. Two of the genes for chitin degradation were further revealed to be acquired via lateral gene transfer (LGT) implying the importance of LGT in the evolution of symbiosis. Our single-cell-based approach successfully characterized the function of each protist in termite hindgut and explained why the gut community includes multiple species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据