4.6 Article

Hybrid-Lambda: simulation of multiple merger and Kingman gene genealogies in species networks and species trees

期刊

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0721-y

关键词

Hybridization; Multiple merger; Gene tree; Coalescent; F-ST; Infinite sites model; Hybrid-lambda; Skewed offspring distribution

资金

  1. New Zealand Marsden Fund
  2. EPSRC [EP/G052026/1]
  3. DFG through the SPP Priority Programme Probabilistic Structures in Evolution [BL 1105/3-1]
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
  6. U.S. Department of Agriculture through NSF [EF-0832858]
  7. University of Tennessee, Knoxville
  8. EPSRC [EP/G052026/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  10. Direct For Biological Sciences [1300426] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G052026/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: There has been increasing interest in coalescent models which admit multiple mergers of ancestral lineages; and to model hybridization and coalescence simultaneously. Results: Hybrid-Lambda is a software package that simulates gene genealogies under multiple merger and Kingman's coalescent processes within species networks or species trees. Hybrid-Lambda allows different coalescent processes to be specified for different populations, and allows for time to be converted between generations and coalescent units, by specifying a population size for each population. In addition, Hybrid-Lambda can generate simulated datasets, assuming the infinitely many sites mutation model, and compute the FST statistic. As an illustration, we apply Hybrid-Lambda to infer the time of subdivision of certain marine invertebrates under different coalescent processes. Conclusions: Hybrid-Lambda makes it possible to investigate biogeographic concordance among high fecundity species exhibiting skewed offspring distribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据