4.3 Article

The effects of gait retraining in runners with patellofemoral pain: A randomized trial

期刊

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
卷 35, 期 -, 页码 14-22

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.03.010

关键词

Injury; Knee; Lower extremity; Running

资金

  1. New Mexico Graduate Professional and Student Association
  2. Research Allocation Committee at University of New Mexico [353110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Running popularity has increased resulting in a concomitant increase in running-related injuries with patellofemoral pain most commonly reported. The purpose of this study was to determine whether gait retraining by modifying footstrike patterns from rearfoot strike to forefoot strike reduces patellofemoral pain and improves associated biomechanical measures, and whether the modification influences risk of ankle injuries. Methods: Sixteen subjects (n = 16) were randomly placed in the control (n = 8) or experimental (n = 8) group. The experimental group performed eight gait retraining running sessions over two weeks where footstrike pattern was switched from rearfoot strike to forefoot strike, while the control group performed running sessions with no intervention. Variables were recorded pre-, post-, and one-month post-running trials. Findings: Knee pain was significantly reduced post-retraining (P < 0.05; effect size = 0.294) and one-month follow-up (P < 0.05; effect size = 0.294). Knee abduction was significantly improved post-retraining (P < 0.05; effect size = 0.291) and one-month follow-up (P < 0.05; effect size = 0.291). Ankle flexion was significantly different post -retraining (P < 0.05; effect size = 0.547), as well as ankle range of motion post-retraining (P < 0.05; effect size = 0.425) and one-month follow-up (P < 0.05; effect size = 0.425). Interpretation: Findings suggest running with a forefoot strike pattern leads to reduced knee pain, and should be considered a possible strategy for management of patellofemoral pain in recreational runners. Published by Elsevier Ltd

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据