4.3 Article

How does differential rod contouring contribute to 3-dimensional correction and affect the bone-screw forces in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis instrumentation?

期刊

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 115-121

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.10.002

关键词

Biomechanical modeling; Pedicle screw; Scoliosis; Spine instrumentation; Differential rod contouring; Vertebral derotation

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [PCIPJ-2011-346145]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Differential rod contouring is used to achieve 3-dimensional correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis instrumentations. How vertebral rotation correction is correlated with the amount of differential rod contouring is still unknown; too aggressive differential rod contouring may increase the risk of bone-screw connection failure. The objective was to assess the 3-dimensional correction and bone-screw forces using various configurations of differential rod contouring. Methods: Computerized patient-specific biomechanical models of 10 AIS cases were used to simulate AIS instrumentations using various configurations of differential rod contouring. The tested concave/convex rod configurations were 5.5/5.5 and 6.0/5.5 mm diameter Cobalt-chrome rods with contouring angles of 35 degrees/15 degrees, 55 degrees/15 degrees, 75 degrees/15 degrees, and 85 degrees/15 degrees, respectively. 3-dimensional corrections and bone-screw forces were computed and analyzed. Findings: Increasing the difference between the concave and convex rod contouring angles from 25 to 60, the apical vertebral rotation correction increased from 35% (SD 17%) to 68% (SD 24%), the coronal plane correction changed from 76% (SD 10%) to 72% (SD 12%), the thoracic kyphosis creation from 27% (SD 60%) to 144% (SD 132%), and screw pullout forces from 94 N (SD 68 N) to 252 N (SD 159 N). Increasing the concave rod diameter to 6 mm resulted in increased transverse and coronal plane corrections, higher thoracic kyphosis, and screw pullout forces. Interpretations: Increasing the concave rod contouring angle and diameter with respect to the convex rod improved the transverse plane correction but with significant increase of screw pullout forces and thoracic kyphosis. Rod contouring should be planned by also taking into account the 3-dimensional nature and stiffness of the curves and combined with osteotomy procedures, which remains to be studied. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据