4.7 Article

Numerical investigation and thermal predictions of asphalt pavement containing inductive materials under alternating magnetic field

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106353

关键词

Asphalt pavement; Induction heating; Dispersed heat source; Thermal field predictions; Random aggregate method; Finite element analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51108150, 51408005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inductive heating asphalt pavement (IHAP) has been widely investigated as the functional pavement, and IHAP is heated by induction heating of randomly dispersed inductive material under alternating magnetic field. Due to the randomly dispersed heat sources in IHAP, it is easy to cause uneven temperature distribution, which is difficult to be described by the existing thermal calculation methods. To reflect the dispersed states of the heat sources and air voids in IHAP and regulate the pavement temperature field, a novel heat source simulation method was proposed through the modified random aggregate algorithm, and an induction heating simulation of IHAP was established. The maximal temperature (T-max) and average temperature (T-ave) of the pavement surface were used as the prediction targets, and the influences of the operational parameters, material composition and the environmental factors on the above targets were discussed. To increase T-max and T-ave, operational parameters and waste steel shavings content should be increased, while the increment of ambient temperature and the decrement of heat transfer coefficient are beneficial to the increase of T-max and T-ave Moreover, the prediction models between the above influencing factors and the targets were established by response surface methodology. The prediction models and suggestions for acquiring reasonable targets could provide scientific guidance for applications of the IHAP to achieve various pavement functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据