4.5 Article

Cs-131 as an experimental tool for the investigation and quantification of the radiotoxicity of intracellular Auger decays in vitro

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2020.1787541

关键词

Auger emitters; RBE; Cs-131; S-C-value; cellularS-value

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides an experimental setup using Cs-131 and dosimetry for studying the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of Auger emitters. The intracellular activity concentration of Cs-131 was measured over time to evaluate RBE-values. The findings are important for understanding the biological effects of Auger emitters in different cell lines.
Purpose In this work, we set out to provide an experimental setup, using Cs-131, with associated dosimetry for studying relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of Auger emitters. Material and methods Cs-131 decays by 100% electron capture producing K- (9%) and L- (80%) Auger electrons with mean energies of 26 keV and 3.5 keV, respectively, plus approximate to 9.4 very low energy electrons (<0.5 keV) per decay. Cs-131 accumulates in the cells through the Na+/K+-ATPase. By this uptake mechanism and the alkali chemistry of Cs+, we argue for its intracellular homogeneous distribution. Cs-131 was added to the cell culture medium of HeLa and V79 Cells. The bio-kinetics of Cs-131 (uptake, release, intracellular distribution) was examined by measuring its intracellular activity concentration over time. Taking advantage of the 100% confluent cellular monolayer, we developed a new and robust dosimetry that is entrusted to a quantity calledS(C)-value. Results TheS(C)-values evaluated in the cell nucleus are almost independent of the nuclear size and geometry. We obtained dose-rate controlled RBE-values for intracellular Cs-131 decay. Using the gamma H2AX assay, the RBE was 1 for HeLa cells. Using the clonogenic cell survival, it was 3.9 for HeLa cells and 3.2 for V79 cells. Conclusion This experimental setup and dosimetry provides reliable RBE-values for Auger emitters in various cell lines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据