4.7 Article

Screening of pharmaceutical polymers for extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing of patient-tailored tablets

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119591

关键词

Personalized medicine; Fused Filament Fabrication; Extrusion Based Additive Manufacturing; 3D printing; Thermoplastic polymers; Tailored release; Mechanical properties

资金

  1. Paltel Group Foundation - Palestine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main objective of this work was to explore the potential of coupling hot-melt extrusion (HME) to Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), also known as Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing (EBAM) or 3D Printing, in order to manufacture 3D printed tablets with different release behavior from plasticizer-free filament matrices. The suitability of different thermoplastic polymers towards FFF was investigated, and a link between the mechanical properties of filaments produced by HME and the feeding performance into the FFF printer was established. Model drugs with different aqueous solubility (metoprolol tartrate and theophylline anhydrous) were processed with hydrophilic and hydrophobic polymers, and the influence of the formulation, drug concentration and applied process settings on the release kinetics was investigated. Filaments with up to 40% drug load were successfully extruded with a smooth surface and a diameter of 1.75 +/- 0.05 mm. However, filaments with high brittleness and low toughness were broken by the feeding gears. In contrast, none of the filaments were squeezed aside by the gears, which indicated that they were sufficiently stiff as indicated by the high Young's moduli of all formulations. For all formulations, the release from the tablets with 50% infill degree was faster as compared to the tablets with 100% infill degree. Theophylline (20% w/w) release from Kollicoat (R) IR matrix was completed within 40 min from 50% infill tablets. In contrast, 80% metoprolol tartrate was released from the hydrophobic Capa (R) 6506 polymer within 24hrs from 50% infill 3D tablets containing 40% w/w MPT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据