4.7 Article

Distinct Local and Systemic Molecular Signatures in the Esophageal and Gastric Cancers: Possible Therapy Targets and Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21124509

关键词

cardia cancer; esophageal cancer; epithelial-mesenchymal transition; tight junction proteins; claudin-2; differential biomarkers; angiogenesis; metabolic reprogramming; inflammation

资金

  1. Wroclaw Medical University [SUB.A040.19.016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gastric (GC) and esophageal (EC) cancers are highly lethal. Better understanding of molecular abnormalities is needed for new therapeutic targets and biomarkers to be found. Expression of 18 cancer-related genes in 31 paired normal-tumor samples was quantified by reversely-transcribed quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RTqPCR) and systemic concentration of 27 cytokines/chemokines/growth factors in 195 individuals was determined using Luminex xMAP technology. OnlyKi67,CLDN2,andBCLxLwere altered in GC whileKi67,CDKN1A,ODC1,SLC2A1,HIF1A,VEGFA,NOS2,CCL2,PTGS2,IL10,IL10Ra,andACTA2were changed in EC. The relatively unaltered molecular GC landscape resulted from high expression ofBCLxL,CDKN1A,BCL2,Ki67,HIF1A,VEGFA,ACTA2,TJP1,CLDN2,IL7Ra,ODC1,PTGS2, andCCL2in non-cancerous tissue. TheNOS2expression and IL-4, IL-9, FGF2, and RANTES secretion were higher in cardiac than non-cardiac GC. Four-cytokine panels (interleukin (IL)-1 beta/IL-1ra/IL-6/RANTES or IL-1 beta/IL-6/IL-4/IL-13) differentiated GC from benign conditions with 87-89% accuracy. Our results showed increased proliferative, survival, inflammatory and angiogenic capacity in gastric tumor-surrounding tissue, what might contribute to GC aggressiveness and facilitate cancer recurrence. Further studies are needed to determine theCLDN2andNOS2suitability as candidate molecular targets in GC and cardiac GC, respectively, and discern the role ofCLDN2or to verify IL-1 beta/IL-1ra/IL-6/RANTES or IL-1 beta/IL-6/IL-4/IL-13 usefulness as differential biomarkers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据