4.7 Article

A mechanistic cutting force model based on ductile and brittle fracture material removal modes for edge surface grinding of CFRP composites using rotary ultrasonic machining

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105551

关键词

Cutting force model; Ductile material removal mode; Brittle fracture material removal mode; Surface grinding; CFRP; Rotary ultrasonic machining

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1538381]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rotary ultrasonic machining (RUM) has been proven to be an effective method for surface grinding of carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) composites. Cutting force is considered as the main criterion to evaluate the performance of RUM surface grinding process. The cutting force modeling is essential to better understand such a process. All reported cutting force models for RUM of CFRP are developed based on brittle fracture material removal mode (brittle mode). However, it is recently found that both ductile material removal mode (ductile mode) and brittle mode exist in RUM of CFRP. Among surface grinding processes, edge surface grinding is the mandatory and primary process to remove an amount of composite material from the workpiece edge to achieve the desired workpiece with high precision. In edge surface grinding process, cutting forces in both feeding direction and in depth-of-cut direction (being perpendicular to feeding direction) play important roles in material removal. In addition, the understandings of material removal mechanisms will greatly benefit the modeling development of cutting forces and improve the RUM process. In this study, a mechanistic model based on both ductile mode and brittle mode is developed to predict cutting forces in both feeding and depth-of-cut directions for RUM edge surface grinding of CFRP composites. A series of experiments are conducted to verify this mechanistic model. The model prediction agrees well with the experimental results under different groups of input variables.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据