4.7 Article

Comparison of broad-range polymerase chain reaction and metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.055

关键词

Broad-range polymerase chain reaction; Metagenomic next-generation sequencing; Prosthetic joint infection; Joint fluid

资金

  1. Foreign Cooperation Project of Fujian Natural Science Foundation [2019I0011]
  2. Industry Education Cooperation Project of Fujian Natural Science Foundation [2018Y4003]
  3. Fujian Education and Scientific Research Projects for Young Teachers [JAT170241]
  4. Startup Fund for scientific research, Fujian Medical University [2018QH1066]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81772251]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The aims of our study were to (1) evaluate the concordance of both methods for detecting prosthetic joint infection (PJI) pathogens in joint fluid and to (2) clarify whether broad-range polymerase chain reaction (BR-PCR) can be used as a verification method for metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for PJI diagnosis. Methods: In total, 63 patients underwent total joint arthroplasty, with 45 PJI and 18 aseptic failure patients included. Joint fluids were sampled after antibiotics were withheld for more than 2 weeks, and then, culture, BR-PCR and mNGS were performed for all samples. Results: The joint fluid BR-PCR sensitivity was 82.2%, which was not significantly different from that of mNGS (95.6%) or culture (77.8%). The specificities of the 3 methods were all 94.4%. BR-PCR failed to identify the pathogens in 1 polymicrobial infection patient and 4 fungal infection patients. Conclusion: mNGS was more sensitive than BR-PCR for detecting PJI pathogens in joint fluid. BR-PCR is insufficient for use as an mNGS verification method. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据