4.7 Article

Effect of free stream angle on mixing performance of hydrogen multi-jets in supersonic combustion chamber

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 45, 期 46, 页码 25426-25437

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.055

关键词

Hydrogen multi jets; Supersonic flow; Combustion chamber; Angled free stream; Computational fluid dynamic

资金

  1. NSFC [51775546, 51979261]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [201941008]
  3. Australia ARC DECRA [DE190100931]
  4. Fujian Province Natural Science Foundation [2018J01506]
  5. Science Fund of Key Laboratory of Hubei Province in Design and Test of Power System of Pure Electric Vehicle [XKQ2020002]
  6. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fuel mixing process within the combustion chamber is a critical procedure for advance of scramjet engine. In current study, the influence of free stream angle on the fuel mixing process of multi jets was thoroughly investigated. This research attempts to applied computational technique to disclose the structure of multi-fuel jets when the supersonic air stream is not normal to the jet direction. The effect of both positive and negative supersonic free stream on the diffusion and penetration of multi-hydrogen jets is fully described. The attention of this research is the flow structure of the multi jets and their interaction in the presence of different free stream angle. Our results indicate that the positive free stream angle expands the mixing zone in the downstream while the negative angle of free stream limited jet distribution inside the combustor. Our results show that mixing efficiency increase approximately 50% when the angle of free stream augments from +20 degrees to -20 degrees. According to our findings, mixing efficiency surges up to 17% when the jet spaces are increased from 4Dj to 10 Dj. (C) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据