4.7 Article

Screening design of nutritional and physicochemical parameters on bio-hydrogen and volatile fatty acids production from Citrus Peel Waste in batch reactors

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 11, 页码 7794-7809

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.084

关键词

Plackett-Burman; Statistical design; Screening design; Fermentation medium optimization; Acetic acid

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal deNivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) [001]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do EstadodeSao Paulo (FAPESP) [2018/26182-1, 2017/01722-0, 2015/06246-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Different conditions for obtaining H2 from Citrus Peel Waste were evaluated, with pH 8.5, allochthonous inoculum of 3 gTVS.L-1, and substrate concentration of 15 g CPW.L-1 found to be the most significant factors for higher H2 and acetic acid production. Escherichia and Clostridium were the main genera identified under these conditions.
Different nutritional and physicochemical conditions to obtain H2 from Citrus Peel Waste (CPW) were evaluated. For this, a screening design was carried out using Plackett and Burman design, in order to verify the main significant conditions of this process. The variables studied were pH (5.5-8.5), temperature (30-44 degrees C), autochthonous inoculum (0.75-2.25 gTVS.L-1), allochthonous inoculum (1-3 gTVS.L-1) and substrate (5-15 g.L-1), headspace (40-60%) and nutritional medium components, such as yeast extract (0-1 g.L-1), CaCO3, NaCl and peptone (0-5 g.L-1). The most significant operational variables were pH (8.5), allochthonous inoculum (3 gTVS.L-1) and substrate concentration (15 g CPW.L-1), conditions that favored the highest H-2 (13.29 mmol.L-1) and acetic acid productions (1340 mg.L-1). Escherichia (34.5%) and Clostridium (29.93%) were the main genera identified under these conditions. (c) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据