4.1 Article

Longitudinal changes in Langerhans cell density of the cornea and conjunctiva in contact lens-induced dry eye

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY
卷 100, 期 1, 页码 33-40

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12399

关键词

conjunctiva; contact lens; cornea; dry eye; inflammation; Langerhans cells

资金

  1. Saudi Arabian Government Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundThe aim was to determine longitudinal changes in Langerhans cell density (LCD) in the human cornea and conjunctiva during asymptomatic and symptomatic contact lens wear. MethodsTwenty-five participants with contact lens-induced dry eye (CLIDE) and 35 without CLIDE (NO-CLIDE), diagnosed using a range of symptom questionnaires and objective tests (tear film break up, cotton thread tear test and corneal staining) were enrolled. The central cornea and nasal bulbar conjunctiva were examined using a Heidelberg laser scanning confocal microscope at baseline and following one, four and 24 weeks wear of daily disposable hydrogel contact lenses. Twenty-three non-contact lens-wearing controls were also examined. Langerhans cells were counted manually from randomly selected images. ResultsIn the cornea, mean and standard error of the mean LCD was greater after one week of lens wear in CLIDE (55 7 cells/mm(2)) versus NO-CLIDE (43 +/- 4 cells/mm(2)) (p = 0.041) and controls (27 +/- 4 cells/mm(2)) (p < 0.001). LCD was also greater in NO-CLIDE versus controls (p = 0.010). At week 4, LCD was greater in CLIDE (41 +/- 6 cells/mm(2)) versus controls (27 +/- 4 cells/mm(2)) (p = 0.004). There were no other significant differences between groups at weeks four or 24. In the conjunctiva, LCD was greater after one week of lens wear in CLIDE (17 +/- 1 cells/mm(2)) (p = 0.003) and NO-CLIDE (17 +/- 3 cells/mm(2)) (p = 0.001) versus controls (7 +/- 1 cells/mm(2)). There were no significant differences between groups at weeks four or 24. ConclusionsThe initial transient increase in corneal and conjunctival LCD in CLIDE (versus NO-CLIDE) suggests an inflammatory component in the aetiology of this condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据