4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Periodicity of large-scale coherence in turbulent boundary layers

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2020.108575

关键词

Turbulent boundary layers; Particle image velocimetry; Large-scale motions

资金

  1. Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the pronounced periodicity of large-scale coherent structures in turbulent boundary layers, which are of the order of the boundary layer thickness (delta) and reside in the logarithmic and wake regions. To this end, a series of multi-camera planar particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurements are conducted in a streamwise/spanwise and streamwise/wall-normal planes at a friction Reynolds number of Re-tau approximate to 2500. The experiments are configured to capture a large field-of-view with velocity fields that cover a streamwise extent in excess of 15 delta. The resulting vector fields reveal large-scale streamwise and spanwise organisation instantaneously, which is often lost when only examining mean statistics. By extracting the dominant streamwise and spanwise Fourier modes of the large-scale motions, a clearer picture of these structural organisations and coherence is presented. A targeted inspection of these dominant modes reveal that these features remain coherent over a significant fraction of the boundary layer thickness in the wall-normal direction, but only a fraction of them have coherence that extends to the wall (wall-coherent). Further, the spatial extents and the population density of these wall-coherent and wall-incoherent modes are characterised, with the former conforming to the attached eddy arguments of Townsend (1976) and the subsequent attached eddy models. Collectively, through the evidence gathered here, we provide a conceptual picture of the representative large-scale structures in turbulent boundary layers, which are likely to have implications on the type of representative structures to be used in structure-based models for these flows.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据