4.5 Article

Extraction of Cu2+ and Co2+ by using Tricholoma populinum loaded onto Amberlite XAD-4

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-020-02845-3

关键词

Cu; Co; Fungal biomass; Preconcentration; Tricholoma populinum; Validation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study proposed an alternative preconcentration method using T. populinum for the sensitive preconcentration of Cu(2+)and Co2+, which was found to be selective for the two ions. By investigating experimental variables in the SPE process and analyzing surface functionalities of the biosorbents, the method showed good performance in sample concentration.
In this work, an alternative preconcentration process suggested based on usingTricholoma populinumas a fungal biosorbent for the sensitive preconcentration of Cu(2+)and Co2+. Amberlite XAD-4 was utilized for the loading of the biomass in solid-phase extraction (SPE) procedure. It was found thatT.populinumloaded with XAD-4 resin was a selective biosorbent for the preconcentration of Cu(2+)and Co2+. Experimental variables in SPE procedure such as pH, the flow rate of the sample, type and concentration of eluent, amount ofT.populinumand of XAD-4 resin, sample volume, and potential interfering ion effect were studied. Surface functionalities of the metal-loaded and metal-unloaded biosorbent were determined by comparing Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy spectra and scanning electron microscopy images. Limit of detection values for Cu(2+)and Co(2+)were found as 0.034 and 0.019 ng mL(-1), respectively. The linear range was found as 0.2-15 ng mL(-1)for both analytes. Relative standard deviation values were found as lower than 3.0%. Certified reference materials were applied for process validation, and also, the concentrations of Co(2+)and Cu(2+)were investigated in real water, vegetable, and soil samples. So, the method developed could be utilized for the preconcentrations of Cu(2+)and Co(2+)for routine analysis. This method can be used as an inexpensive and accessible alternative to GF-AAS or ICP-MS methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据