4.3 Article

Effective biosorption of Allura red dye from aqueous solutions by the dried-lichen (Pseudoevernia furfuracea) biomass

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2020.1785439

关键词

Lichen; Pseudoevernia furfuracea; biosorption; food dye; Allura red

资金

  1. Cumhuriyet University Scientific Research Projects Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the biosorption process of the food colorant AR by lichen. The results show that lichen can efficiently remove AR from aqueous solutions, with a maximum removal efficiency of approximately 87%. The biosorption is found to be endothermic, possible, and spontaneous. Therefore, lichen can be a promising alternative biosorbent for the removal of AR from the environment and wastewater.
Allura red (AR), which is known as the monoazo class of synthetic food colourant(E129) has been widely used in food industries. Due to the potential toxicity of azo dyes and pathogenicity, the removal of AR from industrial wastewaters is very important environmentally. So, this article aims to investigate the biosorption process of AR by lichen (Pseudoevernia furfuracea) from aqueous solutions. Batch biosorption conditions of AR food dye onto lichen biosorbent as initial AR concentration, solution pH, contact time, temperature and recovery were investigated. From the results, it has been observed that the highest removal efficiency is approximately 87% at a contact time of 5 hours, initial AR food dye concentration of 1000 mgL(-1)and agitation speed of 150 rpm at natural pH 8.0. The maximum ARbiosorption capacity from the Langmuir model was found as 0.280 mol kg(-1)at 25 degrees C. Biosorption kinetics were analysed by using intra-particle diffusion and pseudo-second-order models. Biosorption thermodynamics has shown that ARbiosorption onto lichen biosorbent is endothermic, possible and spontaneous. The lichen (Pseudoevernia furfuracea) can become an alternative biosorbent for the removal of AR from the environment and wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据