4.7 Article

Novel polysaccharide from Chaenomeles speciosa seeds: Structural characterization, α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity evaluation

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.03.057

关键词

Chaenomeles speciose seed polysaccharide; Structural characterization; alpha-Glucosidase inhibition

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0400902-3]
  2. Jiangsu Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [BK20181124]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [31800614]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purification and structural characterization of a novel polysaccharide fraction from Chaenomeles speciosa seeds were investigated. After hot water extraction and ethanol precipitation, the crude polysaccharide was sequentially purified with Cellulose DEAE-52 and gel-filtration chromatography, and a highly purified polysaccharide fraction (F3) was obtained. The structure of F3 was characterized by high-performance gel permeation chromatography (HPGPC), high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), ultraviolet-visible (UV), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrum, together with methylation, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), atomic force microscope (AFM), and Congo-red test analysis. The results indicated that F3 was a homogeneous polysaccharide fraction with a molecular weight of 8.65 x 10(6) Da, and it was composed of Rha, GlcA, Gal, and Ara in a molar ratio of 6.34:5.73:47.14:40.13. The backbone of F3 was consisted of -> 3,6)-Galp-(1 ->, and the side chains of F3 were composed of Araf-(1 ->, -> 4)-GlcpA-(1 ->, -> 4)-Galp-(1 -> and -> 3)-Rhap-(1 ->. The hypoglycemic assays demonstrated F3 had good alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase inhibition activities, and their IC50 values were 6.24 mg/mL and 4.59 mg/mL respectively. Thus, the polysaccharide from Chaenomeles speciose could be applied as a potential natural source in retarding postprandial hyperglycemia effects. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据