4.7 Article

Stereoisomerism as an Origin of Different Reactivities of Ir(III) PC(sp3)P Pincer Catalysts

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 59, 期 17, 页码 11962-11975

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00797

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-13-00459]
  2. Israel Science Foundation [N 917/15]
  3. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
  4. Esther K. and M. Mark Watkins Chair for Synthetic Organic Chemistry
  5. Russian Science Foundation [19-13-00459] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two stereoisomers of pentacoordinate iridium(III) hydridochloride with triptycene-based PC(sp(3))P pincer ligand (1,8-bis(diisopropylphosphino)triptycene), 1 and 2, differ by the orientation of hydride ligand relative to the bridgehead ring of triptycene. According to DFT/B3PW91/def2-TZVP calculations performed, an equatorial Cl ligand can relatively easily change its position in 1, whereas that is not the case in 2. Both complexes 1 and 2 readily bind the sixth ligand to protect the empty coordination site. Variable temperature spectroscopic (NMR, IR, and UV-visible) studies show the existence of two isomers of hexacoordinate complexes 1.MeCN, 2.MeCN, and 2.Py with acetonitrile or pyridine coordinated trans to hydride or trans to metalated C(sp(3)), whereas only the equatorial isomer is found for 1.Py. These complexes are stabilized by various intramolecular noncovalent C-H center dot center dot center dot Cl interactions that are affected by the rotation of isopropyls or pyridine. The substitution of MeCN by pyridine is slow yielding axial Py complexes as kinetic products and the equatorial Py complexes as thermodynamic products with faster reactions of 1.L. Ultimately, that explains the higher activity of 1 in the catalytic alkenes isomerization observed for allylbenzene, 1-octene, and pent-4-enenitrile, which proceeds as an insertion/elimination sequence rather than through the allylic mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据