4.6 Review

Infrared thermography and musculoskeletal injuries: A systematic review with meta-analysis

期刊

INFRARED PHYSICS & TECHNOLOGY
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103435

关键词

Thermography; Injuries; Diagnosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The usage of thermal imaging for the diagnosis of musculoskeletal injuries has been demonstrated in which several diagnostic accuracy studies. Objective: This paper aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of infrared thermal imaging in detecting musculoskeletal injuries. Method: A systematic literature search was carried out in August 2019 in MEDLINE, LILACS, SCOPUS, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane, Scopus, Science Direct, CINAHL and Web of Science databases. The MeSH and DeCS descriptors used were Thermography and Injury with their synonyms (nine and sixteen, respectively) to find studies that followed the PIRT strategy: participants (non-elderly); index test (thermography); reference test (xray, arthroscopy, ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography) and target condition (musculoskeletal injuries). The following data were extracted from the studies: author/year; the profile of the sample, the type and location of the injury, the thermographic protocol of evaluation, the acclimatization time, the reference standard, that statistical method used and if the study provided the data of the 2x2 table. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR + and LR-, respectively), odds ratios (OR) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) were calculated and the DerSimonian Laird Method (random-effect model). The Begg Test was used to quantitatively analyze the publication bias. Results: A total of 2,947 studies were retrieved from the databases and nine were selected (six for the quantitative analysis). The meta-analysis showed that thermography presented a sensitivity of 0.70 (95%CI = 0.63-0.76); specificity of 0.75 (95% CI = 0.69-0.81); LR + of 2.45 (95%CI = 1.18-5.06); LRof 0.34 (95%CI = 0.14-0.83); OR = 7.54 (95%CI = 1.70-34.28); and SROC = 0.81 to detect musculoskeletal injuries. Conclusion: Infrared thermal imaging had a good diagnostic value for musculoskeletal injuries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据