4.5 Review

Macrophage polarization and its role in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome

期刊

INFLAMMATION RESEARCH
卷 69, 期 9, 页码 883-895

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00011-020-01378-2

关键词

Acute lung injury; Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Macrophage; Macrophage polarization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81300050, 31300946]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7182163]
  3. Innovative Cultivation Foundation of The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital [CXPY201902]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Macrophages are highly plastic cells. Under different stimuli, macrophages can be polarized into several different subsets. Two main macrophage subsets have been suggested: classically activated or inflammatory (M1) macrophages and alternatively activated or anti-inflammatory (M2) macrophages. Macrophage polarization is governed by a highly complex set of regulatory networks. Many recent studies have shown that macrophages are key orchestrators in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and that regulation of macrophage polarization may improve the prognosis of ALI/ARDS. A further understanding of the mechanisms of macrophage polarization is expected to be helpful in the development of novel therapeutic targets to treat ALI/ARDS. Therefore, we performed a literature review to summarize the regulatory mechanisms of macrophage polarization and its role in the pathogenesis of ALI/ARDS. Methods A computer-based online search was performed using the PubMed database and Web of Science database for published articles concerning macrophages, macrophage polarization, and ALI/ARDS. Results In this review, we discuss the origin, polarization, and polarization regulation of macrophages as well as the role of macrophage polarization in various stages of ARDS. According to the current literature, regulating the polarized state of macrophages might be a potential therapeutic strategy against ALI/ARDS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据