4.7 Article

Productivity and energy balance of maize and sorghum grown for biogas in a large-area farm in Poland: An 11-year field experiment

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112326

关键词

Zea mays; Sorghum saccharatum; Biomass; Energy inputs; Energy output; Energy gain; Energy efficiency ratio

资金

  1. Department of Agrotechnology, Agricultural Production Management and Agribusiness, Faculty of Environmental Management and Agriculture of the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn [20.610.020-110]
  2. [010/RID/2018/19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The biomass yield and energy efficiency of maize and sweet sorghum were evaluated based on the results of an 11-year experiment conducted in a large-area farm in north-eastern Poland. The demand for energy in the production of maize biomass was estimated at 24.4-25.5 GJ ha(-1). Energy consumption in the production of sweet sorghum biomass was 2.8 GJ ha(-1) lower on average. Mineral fertilization was the major energy input (72-73 %) in the cultivation of both crops, mainly due to the high energy value of mineral fertilizers (66-71 %) and, to a lesser extent, the demand for energy during fertilizer application. The average maize yields in northeastern Poland reached 21.7 Mg ha(-1) dry matter (DM). The biomass yield of sweet sorghum was 4.0 Mg ha(-1) DM lower on average. The variability in sweet sorghum biomass yields was nearly 1.5- to 2-fold higher relative to maize. The energy output of maize biomass ranged from 197 to 290 GJ ha(-1) y(-1), whereas the average energy output of sorghum biomass was 61 GJ ha(-1) lower. The energy gain and the energy efficiency ratio of maize biomass were determined at 172-265 GJ ha(-1) and 7.7-11.3, respectively. The above parameters were 58 GJ ha(-1) and 14 % lower in sweet sorghum biomass, respectively. In north-eastern Poland, sweet sorghum yields exceeded maize yields, and sweet sorghum was characterized by a more favorable energy balance only in years with above-average precipitation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据