4.6 Article

Supertough Poly(lactic acid) and Sustainable Elastomer Blends Compatibilized by PLLA-b-PMMA Block Copolymers as Effective A-b-C-Type Compatibilizers

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 31, 页码 13956-13968

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c00988

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51573130]
  2. Scheme for Promotion of Academic and Research Collaboration (SPARC) [SPARC/2018-2019/P485/SL]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA)-b-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) block copolymers with well-defined chemical structures were synthesized by ring-opening polymerization followed by atom-transfer radical polymerization. These copolymers were investigated as effective A-b-C-type compatibilizers for poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and renewable poly(epichlorohydrin-co-ethylene oxide) (ECO) elastomer blends. Compared to the neat binary PLA/ECO blend, the PLLA-b-PMMA copolymers significantly improved the compatibility of the PLA and ECO phases, leading to enhanced interfacial adhesion and mechanical performance. Interestingly, by tuning the chain structure and adding different amounts of the copolymer, two different phase structures were achieved in the blends: a typical sea-island morphology of the blends with a low content of PLLA-b-PMMA block copolymers (<15%) and a unique tricontinuous phase morphology with a percolated PLLA-b-PMMA copolymer zone of the blend with the addition of 20 wt % asymmetric A181M868 block copolymer. Both the morphological structures endowed the blends with excellent toughness, including a high elongation at break (>260%) and non-broken behavior with an optimum impact strength above 63 kJ/m(2). Accordingly, two different toughening mechanisms were proposed for the blends with different phase structures. The PLLA-b-PMMA block copolymers provide highly efficient and versatile A-b-C-type compatibilizers to fabricate high-performance sustainable PLA-based materials for wide application prospects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据