4.6 Article

Cluster Formation and Its Role in the Elimination of Azeotrope of the Acetone-Methanol Mixture by Ionic Liquids

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 59, 期 29, 页码 13271-13282

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01292

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21776006, 21878010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ionic liquids (ILs) are promising entrainers in the separation of azeotropic systems with unique advantages, such as environmental benignity and flexible design. In this work, we carried out molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to elucidate the underlying mechanism in the separation of a typical azeotropic mixture, acetone (A)-methanol (M), using an efficient IL entrainer, 1,3-dimethylimidazolium dimethylphosphate [MMIM][HDM]), which was proposed in our previous work. Upon the addition of the IL, the excess enthalpies decrease significantly, especially in the acetone-rich mixture. An analysis based on energy breakdown in MD simulations indicated that the interactions between methanol and [DMP](-) play a major role in the elimination of the azeotrope. In terms of the radial distribution function, spatial distribution function, and combined distribution function, we discussed the microscopic structures to clarify various interactions among the mixtures. It was found that various clusters of dimensions less than 10 angstrom are formed by methanol and [DMP](-), in the acetone- rich mixture upon the addition of the IL. In addition, we distinguished the types of these clusters in terms of their different connection modes by the detailed information extracted in simulations. Results indicated that the interplay of two kinds of hydrogen bonds, that is, O-H(M)center dot center dot center dot O2(D) and O-H(M)center dot center dot center dot O(M), is responsible for the formation of these clusters. We provided important information to understand the mechanisms of azeotrope elimination by the IL, which is valuable to design new entrainers in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据