4.5 Article

Elevated levels of circulating CD4+CRTh2+ T cells characterize severe asthma

期刊

CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY
卷 46, 期 6, 页码 825-836

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cea.12741

关键词

biomarker; CD4(+)CRTh2(+) T cells; CRTh2; exacerbation; glucocorticosteroid responsiveness; PGD; (2); severe asthma; Th2 cells; type 2 immunity

资金

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP111267]
  2. Alberta Innovates Health Solutions [200700439]
  3. CIHR-GSK Rx&D Chair in Airway Inflammation [233605]
  4. National Sanatorium Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundChemoattractant receptor-homologous molecule expressed on Th2 cells (CRTh2) is a receptor for PGD(2) and expressed by T cells, eosinophils, basophils, and ILC2 cells. CRTh2 expression by CD4(+) T cells identifies the Th2 subset, and these cells have been characterized as allergen-specific central memory Th2 cells. Recently, activation of the PGD(2)-CRTh2 pathway in the lungs was associated with severe asthma. ObjectiveTo assess circulating levels of Th2 cells and related mediators in severe asthma and those who experience asthma exacerbations. MethodsPeripheral blood cells expressing CRTh2 were characterized by flow cytometry and qRT-PCR. Serum IL-13 and PGD(2) were measured by ELISA and compared with asthma severity and tendency to exacerbate. ResultsSevere asthmatics had more circulating CD4(+)CRTh2(+) T cells, CRTh2 and GATA3 mRNA, and a higher level of serum IL-13 compared to mild/moderate asthmatics. The proportion of CD4(+)CRTh2(+) T cells was associated with lower lung function and was highest in severe asthmatics that exacerbated in the last year. Circulating CD4(+)CRTh2(+) T cells, unlike eosinophils, were positively correlated with inhaled steroid dose. Conclusions and Clinical RelevanceElevated levels of circulating CD4(+)CRTh2(+) T cells are a feature of severe asthma, despite high-dose corticosteroids. Tracking the systemic level of these cells may help identify type 2 severe asthmatics at risk of exacerbation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据