4.7 Article

Self-Adaptive Hyper-Heuristic Markov Chain Evolution for Generating Vehicle Multi-Parameter Driving Cycles

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
卷 69, 期 6, 页码 6041-6052

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2020.2989794

关键词

Markov processes; Roads; Acceleration; Automobiles; Indexes; Heuristic algorithms; Resource management; Multi-parameter driving cycles; hyper-heuristic framework; markov chain evolution; generation efficiency; multiple evolution strategies

资金

  1. Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province [2018JM5158]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Representative driving cycles are very important for testing energy consumption and pollutant emission, optimizing control strategy, and designing power resource components of vehicles. Multi-parameter representative driving cycles are needed to improve vehicles' adaptability to the driving environment. Thus, high-dimensional driving cycles need to be efficiently generated. Additionally, the generation method should be flexible enough to facilitate use by automobile engineers. This study introduces a hyper-heuristic framework into Markov chain evolution (MCE). A boundary variable is introduced to refine strategies, and multiple evolution strategies are proposed for self-adaptivity. Then an evaluation function based on the desired driving cycles is designed using allocation and update mechanisms. Finally, an efficient framework is established for generating multi-parameter driving cycles. As an example, the generation efficiency of this framework is increased by 63.25% over the standard MCE method through collecting real-world driving data and considering representative driving cycles with three parameters (velocity, acceleration, and road slope). Analyzing the proportions of hyper-heuristic evolution strategies indicates the self-adaptivity of this method. Compared with an adaptive MCE method with two strategies, the proposed method has greater running efficiency and application flexibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据