4.3 Article

Four-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Coagulopathy Reversal in Patients With Liver Disease

期刊

CLINICAL AND APPLIED THROMBOSIS-HEMOSTASIS
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 1028-1035

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1076029616668406

关键词

hemostasis; blood coagulation factors; bleeding; anticoagulants; clinical pharmacology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC, Kcentra1) was recently approved in the United States for the reversal of vitamin K antagonist-associated major bleeding, but it is often used to reverse coagulopathy in patients with liver disease (LD). This single-center, retrospective study analyzed the efficacy and safety of 4F-PCC administered in patients with and without LD. Prothrombin time/International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR) reversal with 4F-PCC was attempted in 85 patients; LD was documented in 31 patients. Coagulopathy reversal and hemostasis with 4F-PCC were inferior in patients with LD compared to patients without LD. Coagulopathy reversal, defined as INR = 1.5 after 4F-PCC administration, was achieved in 6 (19.4%) LD patients, compared to 44 (81.5%) non-LD patients (p < 0.01). Hemostasis was achieved in 6 LD patients (19.4%) compared to 23 non-LD patients (42.6%) (p = 0.03). Thromboembolic events occurred in 1 LD patient (3.2%) and 8 non-LD patients (14.8%) (p = 0.15). Mortality was 51.6% in LD patients and 18.5% in non-LD patients (p < 0.01). These observations suggest that the efficacy of 4F-PCC is suboptimal to correct coagulopathy and hemostasis in patients with LD, who have high rates of in-hospital mortality due to sequelae of LD. The incidence of thromboembolic events appeared comparable, suggesting that 4F-PCC does not cause undue thromboembolismin LD patients. In conclusion, 4F-PCC appears to be safe in LD patients when administered judiciously; however, further studies are necessary to optimize its use and elucidate its hemostatic potential in this patient population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据