4.8 Article

Decoupling Circuit for Automated Guided Vehicles IPT Charging Systems With Dual Receivers

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 6652-6657

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2019.2955970

关键词

Automated guided vehicle (AGV) applications; decoupling circuit; dual independent output; inductive power transfer (IPT) systems

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB1201002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51977184, 51677155]
  3. Applied Basic Research Programs of Science and Technology Commission Foundation of Sichuan Province [2018JY0586]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is more efficient to employ inductive power transfer (IPT) systems to charge automated guided vehicles (AGVs) than traditional plug-in systems. In order to provide independent and different charging power for the driven system and the control system of AGVs simultaneously, this letter proposes a coaxial dual-receiver structure and a decoupling circuit, which utilizes a passive component connected with two receiving coils to cancel out the mutual inductance between each other. By using this decoupling method, the two receiving coils could be treated as independent receivers without precise placement or additional transformers. First, the decoupling model is analyzed in detail, and the value of the decoupling component is given without any restriction of the ratio of their current. Then, the structure of the dual receiver is designed. Finally, an IPT system with one transmitter and dual receivers is built to verify the feasibility of the proposed method. Experimental results show that when one of the loads varies from 20 to 80 Omega, the voltage fluctuation of the other load is as small as 1.36% with decoupling, whereas 54.46% of voltage fluctuation without decoupling. The results validate that the proposed method is suitable for the application requiring dual independent outputs in the same equipment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据