4.6 Article

Adaptive Dynamic Surface Control for a Hybrid Aerial Underwater Vehicle With Parametric Dynamics and Uncertainties

期刊

IEEE JOURNAL OF OCEANIC ENGINEERING
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 740-758

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JOE.2019.2903742

关键词

Vehicle dynamics; Sea surface; Uncertainty; Underwater vehicles; Time-varying systems; Unmanned aerial vehicles; Prototypes; Adaptive control; added mass variation; aerial underwater vehicle; dynamic surface control; nonlinear systems; time-varying systems

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41706108]
  2. Shanghai Sailing Program [17YF1409600]
  3. open project of Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology [QNLM2016ORP0104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A hybrid aerial underwater vehicle (HAUV) that could operate in the air and underwater might provide tremendous potential for ocean monitoring and search and rescue as well as underwater exploration. Differences between the aerial and underwater environments, along with common disturbances in wind or oceanic currents, present key challenges when designing a robust global controller. This paper presents a nonlinear dynamic controller, otherwise known as the adaptive dynamic surface control (ADSC) scheme, which effectively deals with the challenges aroused by the nonlinearities, uncertainties, and time-varying parameters of the system. First, the mathematical model of the HAUV is developed by means of the Newton-Euler formalism, highlighting the influence of the environment change on the vehicle dynamics. Second, the variations of added mass and damping during the water/air transition are estimated. Finally, the ADSC scheme is used to control and provided robust transition between distinct mediums for the vehicle in simulations, compared with the gain-scheduled proportional-integral-derivative scheme. The simulation results validate the good tracking performance and strong robustness of the presented scheme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据