4.5 Article

Genetic architecture of inherited retinal degeneration in Germany: A large cohort study from a single diagnostic center over a 9-year period

期刊

HUMAN MUTATION
卷 41, 期 9, 页码 1514-1527

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1002/humu.24064

关键词

German population; inherited retinal degeneration; molecular diagnostic rate; mutation spectrum; next-generation sequencing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We aimed to unravel the molecular genetic basis of inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) in a comprehensive cohort of patients diagnosed in the largest center for IRD in Germany. A cohort of 2,158 affected patients from 1,785 families diagnosed with IRD was analyzed by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). Patients with single-gene disorders (i.e., choroideremia and retinoschisis) were analyzed by Sanger sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Our study cohort accounts for similar to 7% of the estimated 30,000 patients with IRD in Germany, thereby providing representative data for both the prevalence of IRDs and the mutation spectrum of IRD genes for the population in Germany. We achieved a molecular diagnostic rate of 35-95%, depending on the clinical entities, with a high detection rate for achromatopsia, retinoschisis, and choroideremia, and a low detection rate for central areolar choroidal dystrophy and macular dystrophy. A total of 1,161 distinct variants were identified, including 501 novel variants, reaffirming the known vast genetic heterogeneity of IRD in a mainly outbred European population. This study demonstrates the clinical utility of panel-based NGS in a large and highly heterogeneous cohort from an outbred population and for the first time gives a comprehensive representation of the genetic landscape of IRDs in Germany. The data are valuable and crucial for the scientific community and healthcare providers, but also for the pharmaceutical industry in the progressing field of personalized medicine and gene therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据