New oral anticoagulants for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with peripheral artery disease: a meta-analysis

Background New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are as effective and safe as warfarin for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Limited evidence is available regarding outcomes for NVAF patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Methods A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. Two reviewers independently performed data extraction and quality assessment using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias. All primary publications and secondary analyses comparing NOACs with other oral anticoagulation regimens for the prevention of stroke in patients with both NVAF and PAD from phase III clinical trials were evaluated. The primary outcomes were stroke, systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and the secondary outcomes were cardiovascular (CV) mortality, all-cause mortality, and myocardial infarction (MI). Results Three articles were included in this study. The pooled results showed a relative risk for stroke/SE with NOACs of 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-1.39), for major bleeding, 1.12 (95% CI: 0.70-1.81), for ICH, 0.47 (95% CI: 0.16-1.36), for CV mortality, 0.77 (95% CI: 0.57-1.04), for all-cause mortality, 0.91 (95% CI: 0.70-1.19), and for MI, 1.10 (95% CI: 0.64-1.90). Conclusion The findings show that NOACs are effective and safe for preventing stroke/SE in patients with both NVAF and PAD.

Automated summary

The study indicates that NOACs are effective and safe for preventing stroke/SE in patients with both NVAF and PAD.