4.8 Article

Intestinal Virome in Patients With Alcoholic Hepatitis

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 72, 期 6, 页码 2182-2196

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1002/hep.31459

关键词

-

资金

  1. DFG fellowship [LA 4286/1-1]
  2. NIH [R01 AA24726, R01AA020703, U01 AA026939, P30 DK120515, P50 AA011999]
  3. Biomedical Laboratory Research & Development Service of the VA Office of Research and Development [BX004594]
  4. Biocodex Microbiota Foundation Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aims Alcoholic hepatitis (AH) is a severe manifestation of alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) with high mortality. Although gut bacteria and fungi modulate disease severity, little is known about the effects of the viral microbiome (virome) in patients with ALD. Approach and Results We extracted virus-like particles from 89 patients with AH who were enrolled in a multicenter observational study, 36 with alcohol use disorder (AUD), and 17 persons without AUD (controls). Virus-like particles from fecal samples were fractionated using differential filtration techniques, and metagenomic sequencing was performed to characterize intestinal viromes. We observed an increased viral diversity in fecal samples from patients with ALD, with the most significant changes in samples from patients with AH.Escherichia-,Enterobacteria-, andEnterococcusphages were over-represented in fecal samples from patients with AH, along with significant increases in mammalian viruses such asParvoviridaeandHerpesviridae. Antibiotic treatment was associated with higher viral diversity. Specific viral taxa, such asStaphylococcusphages andHerpesviridae, were associated with increased disease severity, indicated by a higher median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and associated with increased 90-day mortality. Conclusions In conclusion, intestinal viral taxa are altered in fecal samples from patients with AH and associated with disease severity and mortality. Our study describes an intestinal virome signature associated with AH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据