4.4 Article

In vitro and in vivo induction of fetal hemoglobin with a reversible and selective DNMT1 inhibitor

期刊

HAEMATOLOGICA
卷 106, 期 7, 页码 1979-1987

出版社

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2020.248658

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK [C480/A1141, C5759/A17098]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The orally bioavailable DNMT1-selective inhibitor GSK3482364 has been discovered to have the potential to induce HbF expression, showing good tolerability in preclinical models.
Pharmacological induction of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) expression is an effective therapeutic strategy for the management of B-hemoglobinopathies such as sickle cell disease. DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors 5-azacytidine (5-aza) and 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (decitabine) have been shown to induce HbF expression in both preclinical models and clinical studies, but are not currently approved for the management of hemoglobinopathies. We report here the discovery of a novel class of orally bioavailable DNMT1-selective inhibitors as exemplified by GSK3482364. This molecule potently inhibits the methyltransferase activity of DNMT1, but not DNMT family members DNMT3A or DNMT3B. In contrast with cytidine analog DNMT inhibitors, the DNMT1 inhibitory mechanism of GSK3482364 does not require DNA incorporation and is reversible. In cultured human erythroid progenitor cells, GSK3482364 decreased overall DNA methylation resulting in de repression of the gamma-globin genes HBG1 and HBG2 and increased HbF expression. In a transgenic mouse model of sickle cell disease, orally administered GSK3482364 caused significant increases in both HbF levels and in the percentage HbF-expressing erythrocytes, with good overall tolerability. We conclude that in these preclinical models, selective, reversible inhibition of DNMT1 is sufficient for the induction of HbF, and is well-tolerated. We anticipate that GSK3482364 will be a useful tool molecule for the further study of selective DNMT1 inhibition both in vitro and in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据