4.7 Article

Spatial Dependence of Floods Shaped by Spatiotemporal Variations in Meteorological and Land-Surface Processes

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 47, 期 13, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020GL088000

关键词

spatial dependence; extremes; flood; precipitation; weather patterns; co-occurrence

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation via a PostDoc.Mobility grant [P400P2_183844]
  2. Institute of the Environment and Sustainability at the University of California, Los Angeles
  3. Center for Climate and Weather Extremes at the National Center for Atmospheric Research
  4. Nature Conservancy of California
  5. NSF PREEVENTS award [1854940]
  6. Regional Climate Uncertainty Program (RCUP), an NSF
  7. Bureau of Reclamation [CA R16AC00039]
  8. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers [CSA 1254557]
  9. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [P400P2_183844] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Floods often affect large regions and cause adverse societal impacts. Regional flood hazard and risk assessments therefore require a realistic representation of spatial flood dependencies to avoid the overestimation or underestimation of risk. However, it is not yet well understood how spatial flood dependence, that is, the degree of co-occurrence of floods at different locations, varies in space and time and which processes influence the strength of this dependence. We identify regions in the United States with seasonally similar flood behavior and analyze processes governing spatial dependence. We find that spatial flood dependence varies regionally and seasonally and is generally strongest in winter and spring and weakest in summer and fall. Moreover, we find that land-surface processes are crucial in shaping the spatiotemporal characteristics of flood events. We conclude that the regional and seasonal variations in spatial flood dependencies must be considered when conducting current and future flood risk assessments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据