4.2 Article

Assessment and reconstruction of catchment streamflow trends and variability in response to rainfall across Victoria, Australia

期刊

CLIMATE RESEARCH
卷 67, 期 1, 页码 43-60

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/cr01355

关键词

Runoff; Streamflow; Rainfall; Statistical reconstruction; Victoria; Australia; Water availability; Climate variability

资金

  1. Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute
  2. ARC [DP120103950]
  3. Victorian Climate Initiative (VicCI)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catchments in Victoria, Australia, are essential to the state's water supply, yet have experienced increased stress over the last 30 yr. To gain a better understanding of streamflow variability, 27 catchments across the state were analysed: the majority showed a declining trend in streamflow from 1977-2012, which was largest in the far west and east of the state and smallest close to the Australian Alps. The same spatial pattern was observed for the streamflow reduction during the Millennium Drought. The response of streamflow across the state is strongly related to the mean runoff rather than the pattern of rainfall reduction. In terms of large-scale climate forcings, strong correlations were found during the cool season with the subtropical ridge intensity and to a lesser extent with its position. Tropical modes of variability are important in catchments other than those on the southern flank of the Great Dividing Range; however, they do not explain the streamflow reduction during the Millennium Drought. A simple linear regression was tested based on a temporal range of rainfall parameters with short (from 1 mo) to long (up to 10 yr) memory, combined with temperature, to reconstruct streamflow. High correlations were found between observed and best-reconstructed monthly streamflow. The reconstruction was able to capture the long-term trends and the magnitude of the Millennium Drought well, an important step toward the application of the method to generate streamflow projections using downscaled rainfall from climate models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据