4.5 Article

Biomarker Distributions in (Sub)-Arctic Surface Sediments and Their Potential for Sea Ice Reconstructions

期刊

GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS
卷 21, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019GC008629

关键词

biomarker; IP25; PIP25; sea ice; Baffin Bay; Fram Strait

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through ArcTrain [GRK 1904]
  2. European Research Council under European Union [610055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To evaluate the present sea ice changes in a longer-term perspective, the knowledge of sea ice variability on preindustrial and geological time scales is essential. For the interpretation of proxy reconstructions it is necessary to understand the recent signals of different sea ice proxies from various regions. We present 260 new sediment surface samples collected in the (sub-)Arctic Oceans that were analyzed for specific sea ice (IP25) and open-water phytoplankton biomarkers (brassicasterol, dinosterol, and highly branched isoprenoid [HBI] III). This new biomarker data set was combined with 615 previously published biomarker surface samples into a pan-Arctic database. The resulting pan-Arctic biomarker and sea ice index (PIP25) database shows a spatial distribution correlating well with the diverse modern sea ice concentrations. We find correlations of PBIP25, PDIP25, and PIIIIP25 with spring and autumn sea ice concentrations. Similar correlations with modern sea ice concentrations are observed in Baffin Bay. However, the correlations of the PIP25 indices with modern sea ice concentrations differ in Fram Strait from those of the (sub-)Arctic data set, which is likely caused by region-specific differences in sea ice variability, nutrient availability, and other environmental conditions. The extended (sea ice) biomarker database strengthens the validity of biomarker sea ice reconstructions in different Arctic regions and shows how different sea ice proxies combined may resolve specific seasonal sea ice conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据