4.0 Article

Lithic raw material procurement at the Chaves cave (Huesca, Spain): A geochemical approach to defining Palaeolithic human mobility

期刊

GEOARCHAEOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 856-870

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gea.21808

关键词

chert characterisation; geochemistry; human mobility; Pyrenees

资金

  1. Secretaria de Estado de Investigacion, Desarrollo e Innovacion [HAR-2017-85023-P]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [FJCI-2016-27911, RyC-2013-12613]
  3. Seventh Framework Programme [PCOFUND-GA-2013-609102]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-10-LABX-52]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Chaves cave (Huesca, Spain) is located in the central Pre-Pyrenean range in NE Iberia. It is a huge cave opening to the east, which was systematically excavated between 1975 and 2007. Several human occupations from the Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic periods were documented. Archaeological investigations had barely covered a tenth of the total area when they were abruptly interrupted by the destruction in 2007 of most of the archaeological sediments and all the preserved Neolithic levels that had not yet been excavated. While the most intensive prehistoric occupations of the cave were Neolithic, several components from the Upper Palaeolithic were also detected and excavated before 2007. The recovered lithic tools, as well as the radiocarbon dates, revealed that the Chaves cave was frequented by hunter-gatherer groups during the Upper Solutrean and the Upper Magdalenian. Lithic raw materials from the Palaeolithic levels are diverse, with several chert types identified. The recovered lithic set was subjected to micropaleontological, petrographic and geochemical analyses (energy-dispersive X-ray Fluorescence and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry). The results revealed several origins for the chert, not only from the southern Pyrenees but also from the northern versant, demonstrating that this mountain range was regularly crossed during the Upper Palaeolithic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据