4.7 Article

Parallel bimodal single-cell sequencing of transcriptome and chromatin accessibility

期刊

GENOME RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 7, 页码 1027-1039

出版社

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.257840.119

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Instiutes of Health [AG056318, AG61796, CA208517]
  2. Glenn Foundation for Medical Research
  3. Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center
  4. David F. and Margaret T. Grohne Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Program
  5. National Research Foundation Investigatorship award [NRFI2018-02]
  6. Agency for Science, Technology and Research JCO Development Program Grant [1534n00153, 1334k00083]
  7. Singapore National Research Foundation [NMRC/CBRG/0092/2015]
  8. Biomedical Research Council, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore
  9. Mayo Clinic Center for Biomedical Discovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Joint profiling of transcriptome and chromatin accessibility within single cells allows for the deconstruction of the complex relationship between transcriptional states and upstream regulatory programs determining different cell fates. Here, we developed an automated method with high sensitivity, assay for single-cell transcriptome and accessibility regions (ASTAR-seq), for simultaneous measurement of whole-cell transcriptome and chromatin accessibility within the same single cell. To show the utility of ASTAR-seq, we profiled 384 mESCs under naive and primed pluripotent states as well as a two-cell like state, 424 human cells of various lineage origins (BJ, K562, JK1, and Jurkat), and 480 primary cord blood cells undergoing erythroblast differentiation. With the joint profiles, we configured the transcriptional and chromatin accessibility landscapes of discrete cell states, uncovered linked sets of cis-regulatory elements and target genes unique to each state, and constructed interactome and transcription factor (TF)-centered upstream regulatory networks for various cell states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据