4.4 Article

Parthenogenesis as a Solution to Hybrid Sterility: The Mechanistic Basis of Meiotic Distortions in Clonal and Sterile Hybrids

期刊

GENETICS
卷 215, 期 4, 页码 975-987

出版社

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.119.302988

关键词

meiosis; speciation; gynogenesis; hybridization; polyploidy; clonality; Cobitis; endoreplication

资金

  1. Czech Academy of Sciences [RVO67985904]
  2. Czech Science Foundation [17-09807S, 19-21552S]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [EXCELLENCE CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000460 OP RDE]
  4. National Science Centre, Poland [DEC-2011/03/B/NZ8/02095, 2011/03/B/NZ8/02982]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hybrid sterility is a hallmark of speciation, but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we report that speciation may regularly proceed through a stage at which gene flow is completely interrupted, but hybrid sterility occurs only in male hybrids whereas female hybrids reproduce asexually. We analyzed gametogenic pathways in hybrids between the fish speciesCobitis elongatoidesandC. taenia, and revealed that male hybrids were sterile owing to extensive asynapsis and crossover reduction among heterospecific chromosomal pairs in their gametes, which was subsequently followed by apoptosis. We found that polyploidization allowed pairing between homologous chromosomes and therefore partially rescued the bivalent formation and crossover rates in triploid hybrid males. However, it was not sufficient to overcome sterility. In contrast, both diploid and triploid hybrid females exhibited premeiotic genome endoreplication, thereby ensuring proper bivalent formation between identical chromosomal copies. This endoreplication ultimately restored female fertility but it simultaneously resulted in the obligate production of clonal gametes, preventing any interspecific gene flow. In conclusion, we demonstrate that the emergence of asexuality can remedy hybrid sterility in a sex-specific manner and contributes to the speciation process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据