4.4 Article

Gene fusions characterize a subset of uterine cellular leiomyomas

期刊

GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER
卷 59, 期 12, 页码 688-696

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/gcc.22888

关键词

cellular leiomyoma; gene fusions; HMGA2; smooth muscle tumor; TPCN2; uterus; YAP1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Uterine leiomyomas are the most common benign tumor of the female genital tract. Previous studies have shown that conventional leiomyomas often harbor-specific alterations including rearrangements involvingHMGA2. Cellular leiomyomas are a variant of uterine leiomyoma that are less well-studied from a genomic point of view. Morphologically and immunohistochemically, cellular leiomyomas may be confused with low-grade endometrial stromal neoplasms, a group of tumors which frequently harbor a number of recurrent gene fusions. Ancillary molecular testing may be used to investigate tumors where low-grade endometrial stromal neoplasms enter into the differential diagnosis. At our institution, we identified a uterine cellular leiomyoma harboring aHMGA2-TRAF3IP2fusion. After a retrospective review 11 additional tumors were identified. All included cases were reviewed and evaluated for immunohistochemical expression of smooth muscle actin, desmin, h-caldesmon, CD10, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor. RNA sequencing using the TruSight RNA Fusion Panel was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples. In addition to the index case, two other cases harbored fusions:HMGA2-NAA11andTPCN2-YAP1, of which the latter is novel and was confirmed with reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. In conclusion, a subset of cellular leiomyomas harbor rearrangements involvingHMGA2, suggesting molecular kinship with conventional uterine leiomyomas. In addition, the prevalence of the novelTPCN2-YAP1gene fusion in cellular leiomyomas requires further study. The fusions reported here, when identified, may be useful when the diagnosis of cellular leiomyoma is in question.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据