4.6 Article

Multicenter phase III trial of S-1 and cisplatin versus S-1 and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SOPP trial)

期刊

GASTRIC CANCER
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 156-167

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10120-020-01101-4

关键词

Gastric cancer; S-1; Oxaliplatin; Cisplatin; Phase III; Chemotherapy

资金

  1. Jeil Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer, the S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) regimen showed non-inferiority to the S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) regimen in terms of progression-free survival, with similar overall survival and different toxicity profiles between the two regimens.
Background In East Asia, S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) is one of the standard first-line chemotherapy regimens for metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer (MRGC). Oxaliplatin is generally less toxic and more convenient to administer than cisplatin. Patients and methods This was a multicenter, phase III study assessing whether S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) was non-inferior/superior to SP in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). Patients with MRGC were randomized 1:1 to receive either SOX (S-1 80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-14; oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2)on day 1; every 3 weeks) or SP (S-1 80 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-14; cisplatin 60 mg/m(2)on day 1; every 3 weeks [SP3]). Results Between October 2012 and October 2014, 338 patients were randomized. The median age was 56 years, and 51% of patients had measurable lesions. SOX was significantly non-inferior but not superior to SP3 in terms of PFS [median 5.6 versus 5.7 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-1.07]. In patients with measurable disease, objective response rates were similar between SOX and SP3 (58% versus 60%). Overall, the survival in both groups did not differ (median 12.9 versus 11.4 months; HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.66-1.11). Treatment was well tolerated in both arms. Anemia, leucopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and oral mucositis were more common with SP3. In contrast, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, and peripheral neuropathy were more common with SOX. Conclusions SOX was non-inferior to SP3. The two regimens were well tolerated with different toxicity profiles. The SOX regimen can be recommended as a first-line treatment for MRGC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据