4.7 Article

Experimental study and mechanism analysis of NO formation during volatile-N model compounds combustion in H2O/CO2 atmosphere

期刊

FUEL
卷 273, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117722

关键词

NO formation; Volatile-N; Combustion; H2O; CO2; Nitrogen conversion

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0601802]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51576081, 51976072]
  3. Double first-class research funding of China-EU Institute for Clean and Renewable Energy [ICRE-RP-2018-EFFICIENCY-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work aimed at deeply investigating the effects of H2O and CO2 on NO formation under volatile-N combustion. The characteristics and mechanism of NO formation during volatile-N model compounds (pyridine and pyrrole) combustion in H2O/CO2 atmosphere were systematically investigated via experiments and numerical simulations. The results both showed NO formation significantly decreased with addition of H2O and CO2 during combustion of pyridine and pyrrole. Under O-2/H2O atmosphere, H2O can significantly promote the reaction H + O-2(+M) <-> HO2(+M) which consumed H and O-2 in reaction system. As a result, the chain reaction of H + O-2 <-> OH + O was inhibited and O radical decreased, thus NO formation was inhibited. Under O-2/CO2 atmosphere, addition of CO2 inhibited CO + HO <-> CO2 + H and NCO + O-2 <-> NO + CO2. As a result, NO reduction was promoted via 2CO + 2NO <-> N-2 + 2CO(2) and oxidation of NCO to form NO was inhibited. Under O-2/H2O/CO2 atmosphere, NO formation was further inhibited due to inhibitions of HCN + OH <-> CN + H2O and NCO + O-2 <-> NO + CO2. The mechanism of nitrogen conversion was found: Nitrogen in pyridine and pyrrole was firstly pyrolyzed into NH3 and HCN, then oxidized by O and OH groups to be nitrogen-containing intermediate phases such as NH, HNO, N, NCO, etc. HNO and NCO will continue to be oxidized to generate NO. NCO, NH and NH2 would react with the generated NO to form N-2, and NCO dominated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据