4.7 Article

Regulating structural and mechanical properties of pectin reinforced liposomes at fluid/solid interface

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 111, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106225

关键词

Liposomes; Pectin; Composite vesicles; Thermal stability; Mechanical strength

资金

  1. SERB (Govt. of India) [EMR/2016/004979]
  2. CSIR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the design and properties of pectin-reinforced egg lecithin liposomes, revealing that pectin can enhance mechanical strength and heat capacity, reduce overall bilayer thickness, and maintain structural integrity without deformations.
This work presents the design and study of pectin (PEC) reinforced Egg Lecithin (EPC) liposomes and their structural, mechanical and thermal properties at fluid/solid interface. The liposomes have been analyzed using ATR-FTIR, DSC, SAXS and Quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) with dissipation. An asymmetric melting temperature profile in DSC thermograms with increasing concentration of PEC suggested reduced co-operativity of lipids in the vesicles resulting from different populations of PEC associated lipids. QCM showed PEC stabilized EPC liposome has nearly an order higher mechanical strength compared with EPC as also seen from enhanced heat capacity in DSC. SAXS shows that the PEC locating in the lipid bilayer results in swelling in the non-polar region (similar to 30%) and a reduction in overall bilayer thickness (similar to 6%) compared with that of pure EPC. The nearly equal rotation correlation time tau(r) for EPC (3.25 +/- 0.18 ns) and PEC stabilized liposomes (3.20 +/- 0.2 ns) from fluorescence spectroscopy suggests that PEC in lipid bilayers does not induce any structural deformations. These liposomes visualized by transmission electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy show well-defined morphology. The findings offer a new perspective on understanding the interactions between lipid molecules and biopolymers and may aid in designing stable composite delivery vehicles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据