4.7 Article

Innovative preparation, physicochemical characteristics and functional properties of bioactive polysaccharides from fresh okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench)

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 320, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126647

关键词

Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench); Polysaccharide; Preparation; Characterization; Bioactivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31671812]
  2. Key Research & Development Program (Modern Agriculture) of Jiangsu Province [BE2017362]
  3. Policy Guidance Projects in Jiangsu Province (Science and technology special project in Northern Jiangsu Province) [SZ-SQ2019038]
  4. Key Research & Development Program (Modern Agriculture) of Sihong County [L201803]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  6. Jiangsu Overseas Research & Training Program for University Prominent Young & Middle-aged Teachers and Presidents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, three-phase partitioning (TPP) coupled with gradient ammonium sulfate ((NH4)(2)SO4) precipitation (GNP) method was first used to extract and separate bioactive polysaccharides (OPSs) from fresh okra pods. Results showed that OPS-50 obtained by GNP at a saturation of 50% (NH4)(2)SO4 after TPP presented higher precipitation yield, carbohydrate (86.82%) and uronic acid (22.34%) contents with same monosaccharide composition and different molar ratios compared with OPS-30 and OPS-40 obtained via GNP at saturations of 30% and 40% (NH4)(2)SO4, respectively. OPS-50 had lower weight-average molecular weight (3.65 x 10(6) g/mol), more flexible chain, and relatively looser surface structure compared with OPS-30, OPS-40, and the OPS obtained with TPP parallelized with decreased apparent viscosity and dynamic viscoelasticity. Furthermore, OPS-50 exhibited stronger DPPH radical-scavenging ability, antioxidant capacity, and alpha-amylase and alpha-glucosidase inhibitory activities in vitro than OPS, OPS-30, and OPS-40.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据