4.7 Article

Analysis of phthalate plasticizer migration from PVDC packaging materials to food simulants using molecular dynamics simulations and artificial neural network

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 317, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126465

关键词

Molecular dynamics; Artificial neural network; Plasticizer; Two-component solubility parameters; Fractional free volume; Migration; PVDC

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51703114, 51873017, 51603236]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2017BEM036]
  3. Key Laboratory of Rubber-plastics, Ministry of Education, Qingdao University of Science & Technology Open Fund Project [KF2017007]
  4. Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program [J18KA024]
  5. Shandong Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau Inspection and Quarantine Technology Center [20173702020928]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on the experimental data of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, an improved artificial neural network was first established to predict the migration of 2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP) plasticizer from poly(vinylidene chloride) (PVDC) into food simulants (ie., heptane, ethanol and water). The sensitivity analysis indicated that temperature acted as a crucial factor influencing the migration values of DEHP. Then, a combined experimental and molecular dynamic (MD) simulation was performed to understand the migration kinetics and the mechanism of DEHP. Hansen solubility parameters of three component (delta(d), delta(p), delta(h)) were simplified into two-component solubility parameters (delta(vdw), delta(e)), and the tuple was successfully applied to describe the interactions between PVDC and food simulants. The MD results showed that high interaction energy and fractional free volume in PVDC/DEHP/food simulant systems accelerated the migration of DEHP. These fundamental studies would provide significant insights into the migration of environmental contaminants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据