4.6 Article

A synthesis of (non-)compliance theories with applications to small-scale fisheries research and practice

期刊

FISH AND FISHERIES
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 1120-1134

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/faf.12490

关键词

conservation; criminology; illegal fishing; IUU fishing; socio-ecological systems; sustainable management

资金

  1. ANID PIA/BASAL [FB0002]
  2. ANID-Becas Chile

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-compliance in fisheries is a persistent challenge for the conservation and sustainable management of the oceans and has particularly acute impacts in small-scale fisheries contexts. Small-scale fisheries often suffer from chronic overexploitation, poor management, lack of enforcement and non-compliance, but small-scale fishers are highly dependent on the ocean as a source of employment and food. Improving our understanding of the determinants of non-compliant behaviours in small-scale fisheries can help develop strategies to prevent and reduce its consequences. Here, we review two main approaches for the study of non-compliant behaviours and crimes more broadly, spanning criminology, economics and psychology. On the one hand, actor-based approaches address the underlying motivations for people to comply or not with regulations. Opportunity-based approaches, on the other hand, assume that non-compliance is not distributed randomly across space and time and focuses on the role that the immediate environment plays in the performance of non-compliant behaviours. We discuss potential applications of actor-based and opportunity-based approaches in guiding small-scale fisheries non-compliance research. Moreover, we provide guiding principles for integrating these approaches in a complementary way, highlighting opportunities and challenges for building a better non-compliance research agenda for fisheries and beyond. Addressing non-compliance is a common challenge for natural resource management in multiple ecosystems. Integrating these two perspectives has the potential to improve both research and practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据