4.7 Article

Group teaching optimization algorithm: A novel metaheuristic method for solving global optimization problems

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113246

关键词

Group teaching; Swarm intelligence; Global optimization; Engineering design

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In last 30 years, many metaheuristic algorithms have been developed to solve optimization problems. However, most existing metaheuristic algorithms have extra control parameters except the essential population size and stopping criterion. Considering different characteristics of different optimization problems, how to adjust these extra control parameters is a great challenge for these algorithms in solving different optimization problems. In order to address this challenge, a new metaheuristic algorithm called group teaching optimization algorithm (GTOA) is presented in this paper. The proposed GTOA is inspired by group teaching mechanism. To adapt group teaching to be suitable for using as an optimization technique, without loss of generality, four simple rules are first defined. Then a group teaching model is built under the guide of the four rules, which consists of teacher allocation phase, ability grouping phase, teacher phase and student phase. Note that GTOA needs only the essential population size and stopping criterion without extra control parameters, which has great potential to be used widely. GTOA is first examined over 28 well-known unconstrained benchmark problems and the optimization results are compared with nine state-of-the-art algorithms. Experimental results show the superior performance of the proposed GTOA for these problems in terms of solution quality, convergence speed and stability. Furthermore, GTOA is used to solve four constrained engineering design optimization problems in the real world. Simulation results demonstrate the proposed GTOA can find better solutions with faster speed compared with the reported optimizers. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据