4.5 Article

Marked reductions in outpatient antibiotic prescriptions for children and adolescents - a population-based study covering 83% of the paediatric population, Germany, 2010 to 2018

期刊

EUROSURVEILLANCE
卷 25, 期 31, 页码 20-28

出版社

EUR CENTRE DIS PREVENTION & CONTROL
DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.31.1900599

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Prescribing of systemic antibiotics in general and of cephalosporins in particular in German paediatric outpatients has previously been reported to be higher than in other European countries. Aim: Our objective was to assess recent trends in antibiotic prescribing in German children. Methods: This study was conducted as consecutive annual cross-sectional analyses and included all children aged 0-14 years (n = 9,389,183 in 2018) covered by statutory health insurance in Germany. Annual antibiotic prescription rates from 2010 to 2018 were calculated for the age groups 0-1, 2- 5, 6-9 and 10-14 years. Poisson regression was used to estimate trends of prescription rates by age group and antibiotic subgroup. Results: Overall, the age-standardised antibiotic prescription rate decreased significantly by 43% from 746 prescriptions per 1,000 persons in 2010 to 428 per 1,000 in 2018 (p < 0.001). Reductions were most pronounced in the age groups 0-1 year (-50%) and 2-5 years (-44%). The age group 2- 5 years exhibited the highest prescription rate with 683 per 1,000 in 2018 (0-1 year: 320/1,000; 6-9 years: 417/1,000; 10-14 years: 273/1,000). Cephalosporins (second and third generation) accounted for 32% of prescribed antibiotics. Conclusions: Marked reductions in antibiotic prescribing during the last decade indicate a change towards more judicious paediatric prescribing habits. Compared with other European countries, however, prescribing of second- and third-generation cephalosporins remains high in Germany, suggesting frequent first-line use of these substances for common respiratory infections. Considerable regional variations underline the need for regionally targeted interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据