4.5 Article

A quantitative trait rare variant nonparametric linkage method with application to age-at-onset of Alzheimer's disease

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 1734-1742

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-0703-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging (NIA)-LOAD through NIA [U24AG026395, R01AG041797, 5R37AG015473, RF1AG015473, R56AG051876]
  2. National Human Genome Research Institute [R01 HG008972]
  3. NIA [RF1 AG058131]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To analyze pedigrees with quantitative trait (QT) and sequence data, we developed a rare variant (RV) quantitative nonparametric linkage (QNPL) method, which evaluates sharing of minor alleles. RV-QNPL has greater power than the traditional QNPL that tests for excess sharing of minor and major alleles. RV-QNPL is robust to population substructure and admixture, locus heterogeneity, and inclusion of nonpathogenic variants and can be readily applied outside of coding regions. When QNPL was used to analyze common variants, it often led to loci mapping to large intervals, e.g., >40 Mb. In contrast, when RVs are analyzed, regions are well defined, e.g., a gene. Using simulation studies, we demonstrate that RV-QNPL is substantially more powerful than applying traditional QNPL methods to analyze RVs. RV-QNPL was also applied to analyze age-at-onset (AAO) data for 107 late-onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) pedigrees of Caribbean Hispanic and European ancestry with whole-genome sequence data. When AAO of AD was analyzed regardless ofAPOE epsilon 4 status, suggestive linkage (LOD = 2.4) was observed with RVs inKNDC1and nominally significant linkage (p < 0.05) was observed with RVs in LOAD genesABCA7andIQCK. When AAO of AD was analyzed forAPOE epsilon 4 positive family members, nominally significant linkage was observed with RVs inAPOE, while when AAO of AD was analyzed forAPOE epsilon 4 negative family members, nominal significance was observed forIQCKandADAMTS1. RV-QNPL provides a powerful resource to analyze QTs in families to elucidate their genetic etiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据